Category: 3. Academia

  • Comments on How to build a vibrant technology industry

    Comments on How to build a vibrant technology industry

    Yann LeCun of AI / Meta fame put out a short piece on “how to build a vibrant technology industry” (local copy) focusing on the significance of basic research and the opportunities afforded to other countries than the U.S. right now. It is mostly about academia, how the U.S. system (still) is better than others,…

  • Unethical research, beneficence, and smart experimentation

    Unethical research, beneficence, and smart experimentation

    An unnamed research group at University of Zurich is in the news for unethical research: According to this article by Science and the corresponding Reddit report, a research group experimented with the use of LLMs posing as humans on a subreddit (forum). The research question was to see if and how LLMs were more successful…

  • Not a fan of the title “professor of empirical software engineering”

    Not a fan of the title “professor of empirical software engineering”

    At TU Berlin, until recently, there was a “professor of parser construction” (official title). What was a hot topic 30 years ago, maybe, was not so hot thereafter. Today I see a fair bit of “professor of empirical software engineering” or “empirical software engineering research groups”. I wonder what everyone else in the department is…

  • No.

    No.

    Unbelievable. Well, whoever sent this is at least smart enough not to provide their real name; at least I couldn’t figure out who that is.

  • Reviewing inappropriate submissions never was that easy

    Reviewing inappropriate submissions never was that easy

    I got another random request to review a paper outside my domain of expertise. A quick search revealed that the publisher asking for the review is a predatory one, giving me no sympathy for the authors who did not do their homework when submitting to this publisher. You don’t just pay money to get your…

  • A plea for not writing peer reviews using generative AI

    A plea for not writing peer reviews using generative AI

    I’m looking at the first reviews we received tagged with “use of generative AI in the review.” If and how much AI was used is actually not clear, but if so, they are stirring my worst fears. There are (at least) two things wrong with the reviews we received. Hallucination One reviewer is completely wrong.…