Latest Comments on Science and Academia
-
Only 15% plagiarism! How is this not funny (academic humor)
Just keep that plagiarism to a reasonable level. (OK, I may not be fair, and it may be an English language issue as reuse of materials is generally possible across multiple publications. Still…)
-
GenAI in urgent need of a DEI initiative
Apparently, we are all Linus Torvalds. Or more precisely, if your public profile is associated with open source, ChatGPT might think you should look like them. The following four prompts were entered in sequence (but output was cut short). I only prompted 2-4 after I thought this person from the first output looks vaguely familiar…
-
Not a fan of the title “professor of empirical software engineering”
At TU Berlin, until recently, there was a “professor of parser construction” (official title). What was a hot topic 30 years ago, maybe, was not so hot thereafter. Today I see a fair bit of “professor of empirical software engineering” or “empirical software engineering research groups”. I wonder what everyone else in the department is…
-
Charging money for an ethics review?
Together with a psychologist, I’m currently performing a comparatively simple interview study about the effectiveness of a software engineering method. Proper procedure is paramount in psychology, so we submitted an ethics review request to my employer’s institutional (ethics) review board. I didn’t think we’d need the ethics approval, and lo and behold the ethics board…
-
No.
Unbelievable. Well, whoever sent this is at least smart enough not to provide their real name; at least I couldn’t figure out who that is.
-
Reviewing inappropriate submissions never was that easy
I got another random request to review a paper outside my domain of expertise. A quick search revealed that the publisher asking for the review is a predatory one, giving me no sympathy for the authors who did not do their homework when submitting to this publisher. You don’t just pay money to get your…