Latest Comments on Science and Academia
-

Lost over call for open access for all scientific papers
I’m at a loss over the recent reports on the requirement for all research publications to be open access by 2020. Open access means that the research papers are accessible openly without a fee. There are plenty of confusing if not outright wrong statements in the press, but I’m not so much concerned with poor…
-

Follow-up on the discussions about knowledge for knowledge’s sake
I’ve been enjoying the discussion around Patek’s recent video argument for knowledge for knowledge’s sake in several forums. I thought I’d summarize my arguments here. To me it looks all pretty straightforward. From a principled stance, as to funding research, it is the funder’s prerogative who to fund. Often, grant proposals (funding requests) exceed available…
-

The downside of the “knowledge for knowledge’s sake” argument
On the PBS Newshour Duke University biologist Sheila Patek just made a passionate plea for “why knowledge for the pure sake of knowing is good enough to justify scientific research” using her own research into mantis shrimp as an example. While I support public funding for basic research, Patek makes a convoluted and ultimately harmful…
-

O RLY? LaTeX beautiful typesetting
Too (professionally) funny not to share it.
-

At Dagstuhl for Agile Organizations workshop
-

The ASA’s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose
The American Statistical Associations’s answer to “statistical techniques for testing hypotheses…have more flaws than Facebook’s privacy policies.” is is now available for free.



