Should you get a Doctor (Ph.D.) title?

Yes, if it does for you what you want to get out of it.

Reasons for doctoral research

So what does doctoral research leading to a dissertation and the title give you?

Reason 1: The title itself

You want the title to improve your chances of getting a seat even if the restaurant is full (hat tip to my aunt) or to have your relatives call you a rocket scientist (even if you are not, hat tip to my uncle).

Getting the title for the prestige makes sense. It is perhaps not the noblest of all motivations, but who am I to judge. You may then want to find an easy way to the title, i.e. find a university which won’t take too close a look at what you are submitting.

In German speaking countries, with little to no M.B.A. programs until recently, the Doctor title for the longest time was the last remaining status differentiation that until the end of the last century suggested your qualification for higher office or leadership positions in industry. Some professorships were veritable networks accelerating their members’ careers.

Reason 2: Become a professor

The title is a necessary stepping stone, so go for it.

Getting the title to become a professor makes the most sense to me. You need the title anyway, and getting it helps you to reflect on whether you really want this career, as you see your supervisor gnaw their teeth at whatever distraction the university administration throws at them.

This is virtually true in all countries. Even in Germany now you can go from the doctoral title to a professorship without the need for an habilitation any longer.

Reason 3: Intellectual stimulation

You are curious about scientific research and want to experience it.

Going for the title to experience research is also a valid reason. Scientific research can be intellectually stimulating and personally rewarding. If this is your motivation, you should choose carefully where and with who you perform the research.

Honestly solving a scientific problem requires you to gather arcane knowledge that comes with high opportunity costs, because unless you become a scientist, the gained knowledge is mostly useless.

Reason 4: Solve a hard problem

You want or need to solve a specific hard problem.

Doctoral research can give you the tools to do so, if the problem is scientifically tractable. Then, all the scientific methods help you along the way. If not, you are in the wrong place and you are wasting your time. Also, if you are about solving the problem and not about gaining the title, you can cut out some of the fat that comes with doctoral programs at universities. Of course, if the problem is so hard that it will take you a life-time, the title may become a required stepping stone to acquire the funding to keep working on it.

How the systems differ

If you have read until here, and are confused about some of the aspects, take note that the Anglosaxon and the German(ic) system are quite different.

In the Anglosaxon system (US, UK, the rest of the four eyes, as well as their current and former colonies), you typically have to join a Ph.D. program and will only get in after careful vetting by the department.

In the Germanic system, there are very few structured programs. As you may have noticed, we don’t even call it the Ph.D. title but rather the Doctor title.

The most common way to the title is to have a professor employ you. Then, so the hope, in the paid-for work there is research and that you get the time off to write a dissertation about it for the Doctor title. There is no selective application and admissions process, the professor just takes you in.

The good part is a decent salary (rather than a stipend), but the bad part is that there is so much funding in Germany that you really have to watch out to be hired on a project where there is sufficient research value for a dissertation.

Also, as mentioned, there still are few to no M.B.A. programs in Germany so people still go for a doctoral title for industry career purposes.

I’ll leave the consequences of this for the average quality of a German(ic) dissertation to the reader.

Posted on

in

Subscribe!

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Xavier Avatar

    This was an interesting read, especially as I’ve just reached the end of my own PhD journey and submitted my thesis recently. Looking back, I think the distinction between doing a PhD for the qualification and doing it for the experience of research is an important one.
    For me, much of the value ultimately came from things that are difficult to quantify through the title itself: learning how to approach an unanswered question, becoming comfortable with experiments not working as expected, critically evaluating evidence, and gradually developing the independence to decide what question should come next.
    At the same time, I can definitely appreciate the opportunity-cost argument. I’m now looking at what comes after the PhD, and it becomes quite apparent that highly specialised subject knowledge is only one small part of what may actually be transferable outside academia. Perhaps the value of the doctorate depends as much on what we learn from the process as on the specific knowledge we acquire.

    1. Dirk Riehle Avatar

      Thanks for sharing. One thing I missed is that getting a Ph.D. clearly shows one’s ability to prevail in challenging circumstances! Not everyone has staying power…

  2. Luka Dekanozishvili Avatar

    Being a Bachelor’s graduate, I don’t have much information/experience on this topic, but hearing the news, I can’t help but feel that getting a degree is becoming less and less important for a successful career (outside of academia).

    Especially in the tech field, more and more people are able to land high-paying jobs that have never gone to university or attended any courses. The internet has opened a gateway to so much information that sits at our fingertips that now there are really high-quality ways of achieving what universities set out to do in terms of teaching.

    The German market is also changing, and degrees are slowly losing importance. I don’t think this is a bad thing because I believe in equal opportunity, and hiring the best person for the job – one that has the most experience and expertise as opposed to having attended one way of learning something out of many ways.

    Obviously, as you wrote, the academic title is a form of a “status symbol”, a requirement for becoming a professor etc., and I get the appeal of it if you want to go into academia, but if those aren’t your goals, I can see the time and energy being better invested someplace else.

    Being a Bachelor’s graduate of Computer Science (very soon technically), I’m going directly after a full-time job. But I do see a lot (or the majority) of my friends going for Masters. They’re after a higher salary and better job opportunities after they graduate, but as I said, this is slowly becoming not so relevant.

    I personally think they’re delaying entering the “job market”, and giving themselves more time to build up their technical expertise. But what they teach at university (e.g. for Computer Science) and what the job is like is often very different. Computer Science is a science after all, and Software Development is a job for problem-solving. While the skillset may be shared, I believe gaining practical experience instead of the (mostly) theoretical experience is to be more valued.

    – Luka

    1. Dirk Riehle Avatar

      Thank you, Luka, for your comment, and I think you are spot on. Perhaps I should write a similar post about getting a Master’s degree.

Navigation

Research projects

Open data, easy and social
Engineering intelligence unleashed
Open source in products, easy and safe